The risk of thyroid cancer in relation to residential proximity to nuclear power plants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Autor: | Cottagiri SA; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Queens University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. 20sac8@queensu.ca., King W; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Queens University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada., Rodriguez-Villamizar L; Faculty of Health, Industrial University of Santander, Cra. 32, Santander, Bucaramanga, #29-31, Colombia., Villeneuve PJ; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Queens University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.; Department of Neuroscience, Health Sciences Building, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Environmental health : a global access science source [Environ Health] 2024 Nov 29; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 106. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 29. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12940-024-01143-6 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, and there is a public concern but limited evidence that it increases the incidence of cancer among those who live near nuclear power plants (NPPs). Previous analyses of thyroid cancer in these populations have been inconsistent, and the last synthesis was published nearly a decade ago. To address these gaps, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A search strategy was developed and applied to PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. A total of 2006 publications were identified, with 11 studies of thyroid cancer incidence that met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) tool. Summary risk estimates relating residential proximity to the NPPs and thyroid cancer were generated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity in the risk estimates was assessed for study features that included: distance to the NPP, study quality, and biological sex. Results: The 11 studies were categorized as either highly (n = 8) or plausibly (n = 3) prone to bias, primarily due to the reliance on ecological study designs. The meta-analysis summary relative risk of thyroid cancer among those who live close to NPPs (defined by ≤ 25 km distance or jurisdictional areas (e.g., community, county) relative to those who lived further away was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.93-1.29). The risk estimates were higher for studies that modelled more proximal residential distances (≤ 5 km) to NPPs than larger distances (≤ 25 km and jurisdictional areas). We found that the summary risk (RR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.77-2.16) was stronger among those studies less prone to bias. A non-significant increased risk was found among both men and women, but there was no evidence of sex differences in risk. Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest that living near a nuclear power plant increases the risk of thyroid cancer. The small number of studies on this topic, and the finding of higher risks in studies less prone to bias highlights the need for better-designed studies. Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable (use of secondary data). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. (© 2024. Crown.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |