| Autor: |
Plimon M; Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Leinweber ME; Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Hofmann AG; Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Ksiazek SH; Department of Medicine VI, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Taher F; Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Werzowa J; Department of Medicine I, Hanusch Clinic, 1140 Vienna, Austria., Säemann M; Department of Medicine VI, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria., Assadian A; Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinic Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria. |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives : The choice of vascular access continues to be a critical component in the management of hemodialysis patients. Despite the international consensus favoring arteriovenous (AV) fistulas, the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) remains prevalent, with substantial variations across countries and even among dialysis centers within the same region. This study examines the prevalence of CVC use among chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients in Vienna, Austria, and explores inter-center differences. Methods : A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients receiving CVC-based CHD in Vienna as of March 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities and their hemodialysis history were collected. Additionally, a subset of the population underwent vascular access (VA) mapping to assess eligibility for AV fistula (AVF) or AV graft (AVG) creation. Results : A total of 335 patients received CVC-based hemodialysis, equaling a CVC proportion of 42.5%. 191 (57.0%) patients on CVC-based CHD gave their consent to record their clinical data and vascular access history. Of the 191 included patients, 61 gave their consent to receive VA mapping. Of the 61 patients who received VA mapping, 60 (98.4%) were eligible for an upper extremity AVF or AVG. There was no significant difference regarding patient demographics, dialysis vintage, history of previous AVF or AVG or Charlson Comorbidity Index between the mapping and non-mapping group. The odds ratio of having a CVC in the absence of in-house vascular surgery was 3.41 (95% CI: 2.31-5.02, p -value < 0.001) compared to patients with in-house vascular surgery. Conclusions : The majority of patients that consented to ultrasound VA mapping fulfilled vascular requirements for AVF or AVG creation. Our study highlights the potential to decrease the prevalence of CVC-based CHD in Vienna that could translate to a reduction in CVC-associated complications. |
