Reliability of online visual and proprioceptive feedback: impact on learning and sensorimotor coding.

Autor: Scotto CR; Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS, CERCA, Poitiers, France. cecile.scotto@univ-poitiers.fr., Bernardo M; Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS, CERCA, Poitiers, France., Tisserand R; Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS, CERCA, Poitiers, France.; Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, CNRS, PPRIME, Poitiers, France., Casiez G; Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 CRIStAL, Lille, F-59000, France.; Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France., Blandin Y; Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS, CERCA, Poitiers, France.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Psychological research [Psychol Res] 2024 Nov 13; Vol. 89 (1), pp. 12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 13.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02041-9
Abstrakt: Multisensory integration is essential for learning and sensorimotor coding, facilitating learners' adaptation to environmental changes. Recent findings confirm that introducing unreliability into visual feedback enhances the use of motor coding, probably because proprioceptive cues are given greater weight. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis and, more generally, to explore the impact of visual versus proprioceptive cue reliability on learning processes. Participants performed a 12-target pointing sequence 100 times with different combinations of visual and proprioceptive feedback: reliable versus unreliable. Retention tests and intermanual transfer tests were administered 24 h later. Results showed that learning and sensorimotor coding were both affected by the different combinations of visual and proprioceptive cue reliability. Fully reliable feedback allowed for the best retention, while fully unreliable feedback resulted in the worst retention. Visual reliability alone mediated the level of visuospatial coding performance in visuospatial transfer, regardless of the level of proprioceptive reliability, and conversely, reliable proprioception combined with unreliable vision provided the optimum sensory environment for motor coding in the motor transfer test. Overall, our study highlighted the essential role of both visual cue reliability and proprioceptive cue reliability -and their interactions- in motor learning and its generalization.
Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study was approved by the local ethics committee (no. 201965) with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants gave written informed consent prior to the study. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: