| Autor: |
Carpenter JG; University of Maryland Baltimore School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Jackson A; University of Maryland Baltimore School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Hodgson N; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Zhu S; University of Maryland Baltimore School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Grulu M; University of Maryland Baltimore School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Hanson LC; Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA., Ersek M; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Seriously ill older adults are admitted for post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for curative, rehabilitative treatments, yet experience high rates of re-hospitalization, and death. The primary palliative care in post-acute care (PPC-PAC) intervention is an evidence-based approach designed to help people with serious illness align treatment plans with goals of care, optimize quality of life, and improve satisfaction with their care. Objectives: To conduct a preliminary study and evaluate the feasibility of implementing the PPC-PAC intervention in the post-acute care SNF setting. Design : Two-group, multisite feasibility pilot pragmatic clinical trial with a non-equivalent design. Measurements: Primary outcome measures-eligibility, enrollment, and data collection rates; consultation satisfaction; and fidelity. Effectiveness outcome measure-quality of life using the Palliative Outcomes Scale version 2. Results: Close to 70% of those who were eligible and approached by the study team (45/65) enrolled in the trial throughout 12 SNFs in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Thirty-five were enrolled from intervention sites; 10 were enrolled from control sites (usual care). Most participants (80%) expressed general satisfaction with PPC-PAC, and 90% of clinicians implemented the PPC-PAC intervention as intended. At 21 days follow-up, there were no significant differences in effectiveness outcomes. Conclusion: Implementation of the PPC-PAC intervention proved to be feasible and acceptable among older adults and clinicians. Future research should focus on testing the effectiveness of PPC-PAC and explore strategies for optimal intervention implementation and SNF staff engagement in the post-acute care setting. |
