| Autor: |
Santos M; Department of Otolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar-Porto University, Porto, Portugal., Most SP; Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA., Wayne I; Director W Facial Aesthetics, Department of Otolaryngology, Clinical Faculty University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA., Seneldir S; Sureyya Seneldir Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey., Ferreira MG; Department of Otolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar-Porto University, Porto, Portugal.; Clínica Nariz e Face, Porto, Portugal.; Hospital Luz Arrábida, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. |
| Abstrakt: |
The objective of this study was to describe the surgeons who have incorporated dorsal preservation (DP) into their practice and their techniques. An anonymous form reviewed by the Evidence-Based Rhinoplasty Research Group board was shared on its Telegram group. The study population was divided into three groups based on their answers: "Preservers," "Mainly Structural," and "Structural exclusively." This study included the answers of 145 worldwide surgeons. DP was more common among plastic surgeons than otolaryngologists/facial plastic surgeons; DP techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with 10-20 years of experience, while structural techniques were mostly preferred by surgeons with > 20 years of experience; 50.8% of the surgeons who prefer DP techniques use it in more than 90% of primaries; surface techniques (ST) have been more used, mainly by surgeons who prefer structural techniques (p < 0.001). ST were considered more stable (p < 0.001), more predictable (p < 0.001), and shorter learning curve (p < 0.001). Many surgeons using DP still perform structural rhinoplasty. The most cited concern was hump persistence/recurrence. DP rhinoplasty is gaining acceptance, and ST are favored for their perceived short learning curve, stability, and predictability. However, concerns about hump recurrence cause some to continue using structural methods alongside DP. |
