| Autor: |
Fievez F; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium., Cos I; Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informatica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.; Serra Hunter Fellow Programme, Barcelona, Spain., Carsten T; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium., Derosiere G; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.; Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France., Zénon A; Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France., Duque J; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. |
| Abstrakt: |
The speed at which we move is linked to the speed at which we decide to make these movements. Yet the principles guiding such relationship remain unclear: whereas some studies point toward a shared invigoration process boosting decision and movement speed jointly, others rather indicate a trade-off between both levels of control, with slower movements accompanying faster decisions. Here, we aimed 1 ) at further investigating the existence of a shared invigoration process linking decision and movement and 2 ) at testing the hypothesis that such a link is masked when detrimental to the reward rate. To this aim, we tested 62 subjects who performed the Tokens task in two experiments (separate sessions): experiment 1 evaluated how changing decision speed affects movement speed, whereas experiment 2 assessed how changing movement speed affects decision speed. In the latter experiment, subjects were encouraged to favor either decision speed (fast decision group) or decision accuracy (slow decision group). Various mixed model analyses revealed a coregulation of decision (urgency) and movement speed in experiment 1 and in the fast decision group of experiment 2 but not in the slow decision group, despite the fact that these same subjects displayed a coregulation effect in experiment 1 . Altogether, our findings support the idea that coregulation occurs as a default mode but that this form of control is diminished or supplanted by a trade-off relationship, contingent on reward rate maximization. Drawing from these behavioral observations, we propose that multiple processes contribute to shaping the speed of decisions and movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The principles guiding the relationship between decision and movement speed are still unclear. In the present behavioral study involving two experiments conducted with 62 human subjects, we report findings indicating a relationship that varies as a function of the task goals. Coregulation emerges as a default mode of control that fades when detrimental to the reward rate, possibly because of the influence of other processes that can selectively shape the speed of our decisions or movements. |
