Prevalence of nursing theory citations in non-nursing publications.

Autor: Dickinson JK; Department of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY., Wentzel JA; Department of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: jaw2268@tc.columbia.edu., Schwenk J; Department of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY; School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Molloy University, Rockville Centre, NY., Ayala LA; Department of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Nursing outlook [Nurs Outlook] 2024 Oct 29; Vol. 72 (6), pp. 102303. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 29.
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102303
Abstrakt: Background: It is not currently known how often nursing theory is cited in non-nursing publications.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to document citations of five nursing theories in non-nursing publications, including author discipline, type of publication, and publication discipline.
Methods: Over 75 non-nursing disciplines cited nursing theories and were consolidated for reporting purposes.
Discussion: Leininger, Pender, Parse, and Orem were most often cited in research articles, and Watson was cited more frequently in books.
Conclusion: Nurse scholars can use these findings to improve interprofessional education and practice and further develop and disseminate nursing knowledge.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: