Impact of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Adverse Outcomes: A Robust Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.
| Autor: | Kitano T; Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan. Electronic address: syuukyuu1986@gmail.com., Bartoš F; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands., Nabeshima Y; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan., Sayour AA; The Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary., Kovacs A; The Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary., Takeuchi M; Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance [J Cardiovasc Magn Reson] 2024 Oct 27, pp. 101118. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 27. |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101118 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: There are few meta-analyses examining the prognostic value of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) for a specific type of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to compare the association of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RVEF with adverse outcomes for several specific types of CVD, using a robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis. Methods: Three databases were searched for CMR articles reporting hazard ratios (HRs) of RVEF restricted to a specific type of CVD. For each specific type of CVD, Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses with and without publication bias adjustments were conducted to evaluate the strength of evidence for RVEF according to the Bayes Factor (BF). Results: Among 108 articles (21,166 patients) analyzing 11 CVD types, pooled HR for 5% reduction in RVEF assessed by publication bias-unadjusted, Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis offered moderate or strong evidence of an association with outcomes for all types of CVD (HR: 1.07-1.37, BF Conclusions: In a Bayesian meta-analysis adjusted for publication bias, there was moderate or strong evidence for an association of RVEF with outcomes for only four CVDs. Additional data may strengthen evidence regarding other CVDs. Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|