Rethinking Animal Consciousness Research to Prioritize Well-Being.

Autor: Baker L; PAN Works, Wilbraham, MA, USA.; Mahouts Elephant Foundation, Harran Peopleton, UK.; Sarah Lawrence College, Biology, Bronxville, NY, USA., King BJ; PAN Works, Wilbraham, MA, USA.; Department of Anthropology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA., Lynn WS; PAN Works, Wilbraham, MA, USA.; Marsh Institute, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees [Camb Q Healthc Ethics] 2024 Oct 28, pp. 1-5. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 28.
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180124000501
Abstrakt: The authors critique the NY Declaration on Animal Consciousness, which does not denounce continued captivity and invasive research in the pursuit of animal consciousness markers. They argue that such research often increases animal suffering by accepting harmful practices. Instead, they propose a nonanthropocentric, ethical framework aligned with the Belmont Report's principle of beneficence, advocating for noninvasive methods in natural habitats. This approach prioritizes animal well-being, recognizing and safeguarding the intrinsic value of all conscious beings.
Databáze: MEDLINE