| Autor: |
Suzuki M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Yamagata 990-8510, Japan.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai 983-8520, Japan., Tanaka Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Yamagata 990-8510, Japan., Hashimoto K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan., Tsubakino T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Central Hospital, Yamagata 990-8510, Japan., Hoshikawa T; Sendai Orthopaedic Hospital, Sendai 984-0038, Japan., Takahashi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan., Latt MM; Mandalay Orthopaedic Hospital, Mandalay 11101, Myanmar., Aizawa T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background/Objectives : Low back pain is thought to be caused by lumbar instability. To date, multiple definitions of radiological lumbar instability have been used without verifying the "normal range" of the lumbar segmental mobility. Ideally, normative data for lumbar mobility in healthy individuals are required to establish an acceptable threshold for lumbar instability. This study aims to elucidate (i) the prevalence of so-called radiological lumbar instability at each lumbar spine level in conventional criteria and (ii) a practical radiological threshold for lumbar instability in healthy individuals. Methods : Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent standard active dynamic radiography of the lumbar spine in the standing position. Intervertebral range of motion (IROM) and sagittal translation distance (ΔST) were measured at each intervertebral level. Nachemson's criteria of radiological lumbar instability were applied. Results : This study involved four hundred and twenty participants (249 males and 171 females); 76% (320/420) met the criteria for radiological lumbar instability. The definition of lumbar instability based on IROM and ΔST was achieved by 0.2% and 1.7% of participants at the L5-sacrum (L5-S) level, respectively. Conclusions : The normative data of lumbar mobility were obtained from a large number of participants who had less LBP-related ADL disability. The widely accepted criteria for lumbar instability were not applicable except for the L5-S level. Further studies of lumbar mobility, including patients with severe LBP, might prove the relationship between hypermobility of the lumbar spine and LBP. |
