| Autor: |
Acton LW; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA., Lerner NM; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA., White KO; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.; Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA., Johns SL; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Dill D; Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Janiak E; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
We aim to develop and formatively evaluate a brief social needs screening tool that adheres to Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) clinical service standards for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) agencies and is acceptable and feasible for use by staff during a clinical encounter. Through a multi-stage literature and expert review process, we developed an evidence-informed, two-page social needs screening tool, scoring form, and implementation guide. We piloted this tool at three SRH agencies in Massachusetts and recruited staff to provide quantitative and qualitative feedback through post-pilot test self-reported surveys and semi-structured interviews. Participants (n = 13) felt the social needs screening tool was easy to integrate into their clinical workflow and were comfortable using it with patients. All participants reported feeling comfortable administering the tool, scoring it, and referring patients to appropriate resources, if applicable. Most reported they would like to continue using the tool after the pilot implementation period, either with or without modifications. Our multi-stage tool development and formative evaluation process involving literature review, expert review, and pilot-testing in clinical settings enabled our team to create a brief, evidence-informed social needs screening tool that is acceptable to staff and feasible for use during a short clinic visit at SRH agencies in Massachusetts. Staff felt that there is value in using this tool, are comfortable using it, and are able to integrate it into their existing clinical workflows. |
