| Autor: |
Kukić F; Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Zlojutro N; Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Paspalj D; Faculty of Security Sciences, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Bajić S; Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21102 Novi Sad, Serbia.; Umbra Lab, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia., Kovačević S; Faculty of Security Sciences, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Vulin L; Faculty of Security Sciences, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Rađević N; Faculty of Security Sciences, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina., Koropanovski N; Department of Criminalistics, University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: This study assessed the effects of two distinct RAMP (Raise, Activate, Mobilize, Potentiate) protocols, mobility-focused and reactiveness-focused, on change of direction speed in police students (i.e., tactical athletes). Methods: A longitudinal design with two experimental and one control group was employed. The study sample consisted of 39 police students (aged 19.2 ± 0.2 yrs) who were randomly allocated into three equal groups of 13 participants (7 females and 6 males). Experimental groups were labeled as the mobility group or reactiveness group based on the type of RAMP protocol they performed. During the tactical physical education classes, the mobility group performed four complex mobility exercises, while the reactiveness group performed four exercises for trunk reactiveness. After the specific warm-up, both groups continued with syllabus activities. The control group performed only regular activities based on the study syllabus. All participants performed the Illinois Agility test unloaded (IAT) and loaded (10 kg vest [IATL]) and Functional Movement Screening (FMS) before and after 8 weeks of the applied protocols. Results: In general, improvements were observed across all participants in the IAT ( p < 0.001), IATL ( p < 0.001), and FMS ( p < 0.001). The mobility protocol had a more substantial impact compared to the reactiveness protocol on the IAT (d = 0.55 vs. d = 0.40), IATL (d = 0.44 vs. d = 0.38), and FMS (d = 0.88 vs. d = -0.42). Additionally, the control group, which did not follow either RAMP protocol, did not show significant improvements. Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of incorporating targeted mobility training in the limited time available for strength and conditioning programs, as it improves occupationally relevant movement qualities such as change of direction speed ability. Prioritizing mobility training in young tactical athletes may offer broader benefits compared to reactiveness training. |
