Fast vs slow rubidium-82 infusion profiles and test-retest precision of myocardial perfusion using contemporary 3D cardiac analog positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging.

Autor:	Bober RM; John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121-2483, USA; Ochsner Clinical School, Queensland University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. Electronic address: Robert.Bober@Sutterhealth.org., Milani RV; Center for Healthcare Innovation, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA., Abelhad NI; John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121-2483, USA., Velasco-Gonzalez C; Ochsner Health, Ochsner Center for Outcomes Research, New Orleans, LA, USA., Stewart MH; John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121-2483, USA; Ochsner Clinical School, Queensland University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA., Morin DP; John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121-2483, USA; Ochsner Clinical School, Queensland University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology [J Nucl Cardiol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 41, pp. 102059. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 18.
DOI:	10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102059
Abstrakt:	Background: On legacy 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems utilizing a 50 mL/min Rb-82 profile, test-retest precision of quantitative perfusion is ∼10%. It is unclear whether Rb-82 infusion rate significantly impacts quantitative perfusion and/or image quality on modern analog 3D PET-CT systems. We aimed to determine whether the Rb-82 infusion profile significantly impacts test-retest precision of quantitative perfusion, perfusion metrics, and/or image quality on a modern analog 3D PET-CT scanner. Methods: Ninety-eight volunteers from 3 distinct groups: healthy volunteers (Normals), patients with risk factors, and/or coronary disease (Clinicals) and patients with prior transmural myocardial infarctions (Infarcts), underwent cardiac stress testing on an analog 3D PET-CT. Participants received 3 consecutive resting scans and 2 consecutive stress scans, minutes apart, with two randomly assigned Rb-82 infusion profiles: 50 mL/min (fast [F]) and 20 mL/min (slow [S]). Perfusion metrics (resting (rMBF) and stress myocardial blood flow (sMBF)) were calculated using HeartSee software. Coefficients of variance (COV), repeatability (RC), MBF, and image quality metrics were compared. Results: rMBF correlated well between F and S profiles, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging .91-.93. sMBF was highly correlated between F and S profiles (ICC = .97). Fast and slow profiles were associated with similar same-day test-retest precision (COV 11.5% vs 11.3% (P = .77); RC 21.5% vs 22.6%, for F-F vs S-S). There were no clinically significant differences in MBF values between F and S profiles. Image quality metrics were similar between the 2 profiles. Conclusions: There are no clinically significant differences in precision, perfusion metrics, or image quality between Rb-82 fast and slow infusions using a contemporary analog 3D PET-CT. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu