How to optimise creative art therapy to foster the mental health of refugee adolescents? A Delphi study protocol.

Autor: Ramadan M; Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; School of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan., Nolan A; School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Hadfield K; Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland., Bosqui T; Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon., Ryan M; Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.; School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Oct 16; Vol. 19 (10), pp. e0308620. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 16 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308620
Abstrakt: Objective: This study aims to identify the most recommended components of creative art therapy (CAT) to improve the mental health of refugee adolescents.
Design: A three-round Delphi design is proposed. The first round will include semi-structured interviews with a panel of 12 CAT professionals worldwide and 12 refugee adolescents aged 10-24 in Jordan with a history of participating in creative arts interventions. The hybrid approach of coding and thematic analysis will be conducted to develop statements on recommended CAT components from the interview narratives. In the second round, the same and newly enrolled 24 professionals and 24 refugee adolescents will be asked to rate the statements according to their importance, propose new statements, and add comments. A similar procedure will be followed in the third round, where panellists will rate new and old statements after perusing the feedback from the second round.
Main Outcome Measure: A statement will gain consensus and indicate essential components when rated 'essential' or 'very important' by > = 80% of panellists. Very important components are those with the same ratings by 60-79.9% of panellists.
Results: A list of essential and very important components, perspectives and suggestions will be provided to guide practice and intervention development.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Ramadan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje