Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Analysis of the Efficacy and Mid-Term Quality of Life of an Innovative Robotic Approach.

Autor: Cervigni M; Female Pelvic Medicine & Robotic Reconstructive Surgery Center, Department of Urology, Università 'La Sapienza', ICOT Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy., Fuschi A; Female Pelvic Medicine & Robotic Reconstructive Surgery Center, Department of Urology, Università 'La Sapienza', ICOT Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy., Morciano A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 'Pia Fondazione Cardinale G. Panico', 73039 Tricase, Italy., Campanella L; Urogynecologic Unit, Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy., Carbone A; Female Pelvic Medicine & Robotic Reconstructive Surgery Center, Department of Urology, Università 'La Sapienza', ICOT Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy., Schiavi MC; Urogynecologic Unit, Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) [Healthcare (Basel)] 2024 Oct 04; Vol. 12 (19). Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 04.
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12191978
Abstrakt: Background: The goal of our research is to demonstrate how the combination of Rectal wall Plication (RP) and robotic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy (VMR) results in a safe and effective operation that provides superior outcomes for patients with Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS). Methods: In a total of 78 women with ODS with posterior compartment prolapse, 30 had VMR whereas 33 received VMR plus RP. We assessed VMR and VMR + RP's efficacy and safety, as well as their influence on quality of life and sexual function. Results: At the median follow-up, both groups' POP-Q categorization scores for the posterior compartment decreased ( p < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, the PISQ-12 showed an increase in sexual quality (30.12 ± 7.12 vs. 35.98 ± 5.98 in the VMR group and 29.65 ± 6.45 vs. 29.65 ± 6.45 in the VMR + RP group, p = 0.041). In the VMR + RP group, the number of sexually active patients with at least two sexual interactions per month rose ( p = 0.033). At the median follow-up, the ODS score values differed significantly (7.11 ± 1.65 vs. 1.88 ± 1.89, p = 0.013). Conclusions: The combination of rectal wall plication and ventral mesh rectopexy may result in improved bowel function and quality of life.
Databáze: MEDLINE