Autor: |
Crombé A; SARCOTARGET Team, Bordeaux Research Institute in Oncology (BRIC) INSERM U1312 & University of Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, France.; Department of Skeletal Radiology, Pellegrin University Hospital, F-33076 Bordeaux, France.; Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux, France., Simonetti M; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy., Longhi A; Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas, and Innovative Therapies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy., Hauger O; Department of Skeletal Radiology, Pellegrin University Hospital, F-33076 Bordeaux, France., Fadli D; Department of Skeletal Radiology, Pellegrin University Hospital, F-33076 Bordeaux, France., Spinnato P; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy. |
Abstrakt: |
Background: Osteosarcomas are rare malignancies (<1% of all cancers) that produce an osteoid matrix. Osteosarcomas are the second most frequent type of primary bone tumor after multiple myeloma and the most prevalent primary bone tumor in children. The spectrum of imaging findings of these malignancies varies significantly, reflecting different histological subtypes. For instance, conventional osteosarcoma typically presents with a mixed radiological pattern (lytic and bone mineralization) or with a completely eburneous one; aggressive periosteal reactions such as sunburst, Codman triangle, and soft-tissue components are frequently displayed. On the other hand, telangiectatic osteosarcoma usually presents as a purely lytic lesion with multiple fluid-fluid levels on MRI fluid-sensitive sequences. Other typical and atypical radiological patterns of presentation in other subtypes of osteosarcomas are described in this review. In addition to the characteristics associated with osteosarcoma subtyping, this review article also focuses on imaging features that have been associated with patient outcomes, namely response to chemotherapy and event-free and overall survivals. This includes simple semantic radiological features (such as tumor dimensions, anatomical location with difficulty of radical surgery, occurrence of pathological fractures, and presence of distant metastases), but also quantitative imaging parameters from diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography and radiomics approaches. Other particular features are described in the text. Overall, this comprehensive literature review aims to be a practical tool for oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, and radiologists involved in these patients' care. |