Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: An International Study.
Autor: | Abasıyanık Z; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Universitair MS Centrum (UMSC), Hasselt-Pelt, Belgium; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. Electronic address: zuhal.abasiyanik@uhasselt.be., Pedullà L; Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy., Kahraman T; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey., D'Hooge M; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Universitair MS Centrum (UMSC), Hasselt-Pelt, Belgium; National MS Center, Melsbroek, Belgium., Santoyo-Medina C; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology & Neurorehabilitation Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain., Soler B; Hospital Doctor Sótero del Río, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Tacchino A; Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy., Veldkamp R; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Universitair MS Centrum (UMSC), Hasselt-Pelt, Belgium., Meza-Murillo ER; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology & Neurorehabilitation Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain., Omar A; Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel., Ciampi E; Hospital Doctor Sótero del Río, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Özakbaş S; Department of Neurology, Izmir University of Economics, Medical Point Hospital, Izmir, Turkey., Kos D; National MS Center, Melsbroek, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium., Kalron A; Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel., Feys P; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Universitair MS Centrum (UMSC), Hasselt-Pelt, Belgium. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [Arch Phys Med Rehabil] 2024 Oct 11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 11. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.024 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study SETTING: Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis centers across 6 countries (Belgium, Chile, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Turkey). Participants: A total of 356 pwMS (mean age 47.5±11.5y, expanded disability status scale, 3.79±1.83) were enrolled. Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error) and construct validity (structural and convergent) were assessed. Results: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [95% CI], 0.84 [0.80-0.87] to 0.90 [0.87-0.92]) and internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.86-0.96). As hypothesized, the 3 questionnaires showed a strong correlation with each other, moderate-to-strong correlations with other self-report questionnaires (perceived walking difficulties, fatigue, and fear of falling), and low-to-moderate correlations with cognitive information processing speed, manual dexterity, and dual-task walking performance (walking with word list generation task), showing convergent validity. The DIDA-Q exhibited systematically superior properties. These results were also verified in subsets from 6 different countries. In the structural validity analysis, all questionnaires displayed 2 main factors, allocated as "motor-driven" and "cognitive-driven" subscales. Conclusions: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q have good-to-excellent measurement properties, with the highest properties observed in DIDA-Q. The use of these self-reported questionnaires can be used in research and clinical practice to assess the effect of dual-task difficulties on the daily life of ambulatory pwMS. (Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |