Viromes vs. mixed community metagenomes: choice of method dictates interpretation of viral community ecology.

Autor: Kosmopoulos JC; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.; Microbiology Doctoral Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA., Klier KM; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.; Freshwater and Marine Sciences Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA., Langwig MV; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.; Freshwater and Marine Sciences Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA., Tran PQ; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA., Anantharaman K; Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. karthik@bact.wisc.edu.; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. karthik@bact.wisc.edu.; Department of Data Science and AI, Wadhwani School of Data Science and AI, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India. karthik@bact.wisc.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Microbiome [Microbiome] 2024 Oct 07; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 195. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 07.
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01905-x
Abstrakt: Background: Viruses, the majority of which are uncultivated, are among the most abundant biological entities on Earth. From altering microbial physiology to driving community dynamics, viruses are fundamental members of microbiomes. While the number of studies leveraging viral metagenomics (viromics) for studying uncultivated viruses is growing, standards for viromics research are lacking. Viromics can utilize computational discovery of viruses from total metagenomes of all community members (hereafter metagenomes) or use physical separation of virus-specific fractions (hereafter viromes). However, differences in the recovery and interpretation of viruses from metagenomes and viromes obtained from the same samples remain understudied.
Results: Here, we compare viral communities from paired viromes and metagenomes obtained from 60 diverse samples across human gut, soil, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Overall, viral communities obtained from viromes had greater species richness and total viral genome abundances than those obtained from metagenomes, although there were some exceptions. Despite this, metagenomes still contained many viral genomes not detected in viromes. We also found notable differences in the predicted lytic state of viruses detected in viromes vs metagenomes at the time of sequencing. Other forms of variation observed include genome presence/absence, genome quality, and encoded protein content between viromes and metagenomes, but the magnitude of these differences varied by environment.
Conclusions: Overall, our results show that the choice of method can lead to differing interpretations of viral community ecology. We suggest that the choice of whether to target a metagenome or virome to study viral communities should be dependent on the environmental context and ecological questions being asked. However, our overall recommendation to researchers investigating viral ecology and evolution is to pair both approaches to maximize their respective benefits. Video Abstract.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: