Autor: |
Lee KS; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; Yale Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA., Catmur C; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK., Bird G; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; Centre for Research in Autism and Education, Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK. |
Abstrakt: |
Alexithymia (difficulties identifying and describing feelings) predicts increased risks for psychopathology, especially during the transition from childhood to adolescence. However, little is known of the early contributors to alexithymia. The language hypothesis of alexithymia suggests that language deficits play a primary role in predisposing language-impaired groups to developing alexithymia; yet longitudinal data tracking prospective relationship between language function and alexithymia are scarce. Leveraging data from the Surrey Communication and Language in Education cohort ( N = 229, mean age at time point 1 = 5.32 years, SD = 0.29, 51.1% female), we investigated the prospective link between childhood language development and alexithymic traits in adolescence. Results indicated that boys with low language function at ages 4-5 years, and those who later met the diagnostic criteria for language disorders at ages 5-6 years, reported elevated alexithymic traits when they reached adolescence. Parent-reported child syntax abilities at ages 5-6 years revealed a dimensional relationship with alexithymic traits, and this was consistent with behavioral assessments on related structural language abilities. Empirically derived language groups and latent language trajectories did not predict alexithymic traits in adolescence. While findings support the language hypothesis of alexithymia, greater specificity of the alexithymia construct in developmental populations is needed to guide clinical interventions. |