| Autor: |
Cote MP; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Hamzah R; Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Alty IG; Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Tripathi I; Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Montalvan A; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Leonard SM; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., Kamble J; Department of Public Health, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India., Javed S; Health Services Academy, Ministry of National Health Services Regulations & Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan., Asturias S; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Roosevelt Hospital, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Khajanchi M; Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India., Raykar NP; Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background & objectives Many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs. Methods An initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further. Results The presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers. Interpretation & conclusions Barriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required. |
