Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.

Autor:	Lewcun JA; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System., Ghahrai N; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA., Donnelly M; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA., Luo A; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA., Knighton B; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System., Shin S; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System., Bernabe R; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System., Mountziaris P; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Annals of plastic surgery [Ann Plast Surg] 2024 Oct 03. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 03.
DOI:	10.1097/SAP.0000000000004120
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Inmates represent a vulnerable health care population within the United States, with inconsistent access to surgical specialty care. Facial fractures are common among the incarcerated population, comprising approximately 14% of all traumatic injuries. However, few studies have evaluated facial fracture outcomes in this population. The aim of this study is to identify disparities in mandible fracture outcomes in the incarcerated population. Methods: A retrospective review of all isolated traumatic mandible fractures at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. Mandible fractures were treated by plastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Outcome measures such as rates of persistent malocclusion, motor deficits, surgical site infection, reoperation, and readmission were compared between inmate and civilian subgroups. Results: A total of 205 patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 81.5% male) who were treated for isolated traumatic mandible fracture were included. A minority of patients (11.7%; n = 24) were inmates, whereas 88.3% (n = 181) were civilians. The mean time to operative intervention was 10.2 days in the incarcerated group and 4.4 days in the civilian group (P < 0.05). Persistent subjective malocclusion after surgery was noted in 20.8% (n = 5) of incarcerated patients and 7.2% (n = 13) of civilian patients (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in rates of surgical site infection, reoperation, persistent motor deficits, or readmissions within 30 days. Conclusions: Incarcerated patients with traumatic mandible fractures have increased time to operative intervention and increased rates of subjective malocclusion postoperatively. Increased time to operative intervention may reflect barriers in access to specialty surgical care, which could adversely affect patient outcomes. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared. (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu