Full-arch prostheses supported by implants with different macrostructures: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Autor: Marcantonio ACM; Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, Univ. Est. Paulista/UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil., de Oliveira GJPL; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry at Uberlândia, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil., Tassi PA; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Manfrinato JPL; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Segnini B; Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, Univ. Est. Paulista/UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil., de Souza Bezerra Araújo RF; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Trojan LC; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Fontão FNGK; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., de Mattias Sartori IA; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Sartori EM; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Padovan LEM; Implantology, Instituto Latino-americano de Pesquisa Odontológica (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil., Zandim-Barcelos DL; Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, Univ. Est. Paulista/UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil., Marcantonio E Jr; Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, Univ. Est. Paulista/UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil.; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry at Uberlândia, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical implant dentistry and related research [Clin Implant Dent Relat Res] 2024 Oct 03. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 03.
DOI: 10.1111/cid.13392
Abstrakt: Objectives: This study evaluates the clinical performance of implants with hydrophilic surface and two different macrostructures: cylindrical with perforating triangular threads (CT) and cylindrical-tapered with the association of square and condensing and perforating triangular threads (TST).
Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter split-mouth, simple-blinded, randomized, and controlled trial. Thirty patients with edentulous mandible received two CT and two TST implants. Primary stability was determined by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Implants were loaded with full fixed-arch prostheses within 24 h after insertion. Clinical parameters (visible plaque index, marginal bleeding index; bleeding on probing; probing depth; and clinical attachment level) and the RFA were assessed at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after implant loading. Marginal bone level changes were measured by comparison of standardized radiographs taken on the day of implant placement and 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter.
Results: Twenty-eight patients completed the 2-year follow-up. The survival rates were 99.16% for CT implants and 100% for TST implants. One CT implant was lost until the 2 months follow-up. No significant differences were found between the two implant types for marginal bone level changes (CT 0.34 [0.24; 0.55 mm]; 0.33 [0.18; 0.55 mm]; 0.41 [0.12; 0.7 mm] vs TST 0.36 [0.14; 0.74 mm]; 0.33 [0.23; 0.63 mm]; 0.30 [0.20; 0.64 mm] at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively) and other clinical parameters.
Conclusion: The macrostructure of the implants had no influence on survival rate, primary and secondary stability, marginal bone level changes, and peri-implant clinical parameters outcomes. Both implants can be predictably used for immediate loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses.
(© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
Databáze: MEDLINE