Practice recommendations for culturally sensitive communication at the end of life in intensive care: A modified eDelphi study.
Autor: | Brooks LA; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: laura.brooks@deakin.edu.au., Manias E; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia., Rasmussen B; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia; Sector of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark., Bloomer MJ; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Intensive & critical care nursing [Intensive Crit Care Nurs] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 86, pp. 103814. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 01. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103814 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Clinicians need specific knowledge and skills to effectively communicate with patients and their family when a patient is dying in the ICU. End-of-life communication is compounded by language differences and diverse cultural and religious beliefs. Aim: The aim was to develop and evaluate practice recommendations for culturally sensitive communication at the end of life. Method: Modified two-round eDelphi study. An Australian national sample of 58 expert ICU clinicians of nursing and medical backgrounds participated in an online survey to rate the relevance of 13 practice recommendations. Ten clinicians participated in a subsequent expert panel interview to provide face validity and comprehensive details about the practical context of the recommendations. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, interview data using deductive content analysis. Results: All 13 practice recommendations achieved item content validity index (I-CVI) above 0.8, and scale content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.95, indicating sufficient consensus. Recommendations prioritising use of professional interpreters and nurse involvement in family meetings achieved near perfect agreement amongst participants. Recommendations to facilitate family in undertaking cultural, spiritual and religious rituals and customs, advocate for family participation in treatment limitation discussions, and clinician access to professional development opportunities about culturally sensitive communication also achieved high level consensus. Conclusion: These practice recommendations provide guidance for ICU clinicians in their communication with patients and families from culturally diverse backgrounds. Implications for Clinical Practice: Clinicians want practice recommendations that are understandable and broadly applicable across diverse ICU contexts. The high consensus scores confirm these practice recommendations are relevant and feasible to clinicians who provide end-of-life care for patients and their family members. The recommendations also provide clear guidance for ICU leaders, managers and organisational policy makers. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Melissa Bloomer is associate-editor for Intensive & Critical Care Nursing and was involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |