Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of robotic arthrometer DYNEELAX®.
Autor: | Mihalinec K; Department of Physiotherapy Biomechanical Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia., Martinez-Cepa CB; Departamento de Fisioterapia Facultad de Medicina, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities Boadilla del Monte Spain., Zuil-Escobar JC; Departamento de Fisioterapia Facultad de Medicina, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities Boadilla del Monte Spain., Kejžar N; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia., Vauhnik R; Department of Physiotherapy Biomechanical Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.; Arthron, Institute for Joint and Sports Injuries, Ukmarjeva 2 Ljubljana Slovenia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of experimental orthopaedics [J Exp Orthop] 2024 Sep 30; Vol. 11 (3), pp. e70026. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 30 (Print Publication: 2024). |
DOI: | 10.1002/jeo2.70026 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: The purpose of our study was to test the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the DYNEELAX® arthrometer in healthy subjects. Since rotational laxity will be measured for the first time in humans, indications for normative values will also be presented. Methods: Knee anterior laxity and rotational laxity using a DYNEELAX® arthrometer were assessed in 73 subjects (39 females and 34 males). An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the DYNEELAX®. Results: An intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-rater reliability ranges from 0.631 (95% confidence interval; [CI]: 0.47-0.75) to 0.699 (95% CI: 0.56-0.80) and from 0.916 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96) for anterior knee laxity and rotational knee laxity, respectively. An intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-rater reliability ranges from 0.578 (95% CI: 0.40-0.71) to 0.646 (95% CI: 0.44-0.78) and from 0.822 (95% CI: 0.57-0.91) to 0.933 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for anterior knee laxity and rotational knee laxity, respectively. Conclusions: The DYNEELAX® arthrometer has good to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for rotational knee laxity and moderate intra-rater reliability for anterior knee laxity in healthy subjects. Future studies should investigate the clinical significance of anterior and rotational laxity measured with the DYNEELAX® arthrometer in patients with knee pathology, as both laxities are critical for assessing the integrity of the intra-articular structures of the knee in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level IV. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |