The Effect of Sticky Bone with Concentrated Growth Factor on Bone on Socket Preservation and Delayed Implant Placement: A Case Report of Two Cases.

Autor:	Sitamahalakshmi K; Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda, Telangana, India., Bingi SK; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda, Telangana, India., Mandhrachalam R; Department of Periodontology and Implantology, JKKN Dental College and Hospitals, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India., Sai SK; Department of Oral Maxillo-Facial Pathology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda, Telangana, India.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences [J Pharm Bioallied Sci] 2024 Jul; Vol. 16 (Suppl 3), pp. S2965-S2967. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 24.
DOI:	10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1286_23
Abstrakt:	As they release and enhance numerous areas for regeneration signaling and maintenance, platelets are energy sources with a wealth of growth factors (GFs). To create sticky bone (SB), concentrated GF (CGF), one of the platelet generations, was combined with a bone transplant. The purpose of this study was to determine how concentrated SB development affects bone density and volume surrounding dental implants. Two patients with grossly decayed tooth or grade III mobile tooth were included in the study. After extraction of the tooth, SB enriched with CGF was placed in the socket and closed with membrane. After 1 month of socket preservation, dental implantation is performed. Loading of implant is performed after 3 months of implant placement. Bone volume and density measurements were performed immediately after socket preservation (T0), 1 month after socket preservation after implant placement (T1), and 3 months after socket preservation loading of dental implants (T2) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Bone volume and density increased 3 months after socket preservation loading of dental implant (T2) when compared to baseline that is immediately after socket preservation (T0) and 1 month of socket preservation after implant placement (T1). Also, improvement is seen after 1 month of socket preservation. It was observed that SB with CGF shows excellent enhancement in bone formation in quality and quantity of the bone after socket preservation and loading of implant compared with CGF alone. Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest. (Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu