| Autor: |
Qin C; Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA., Joslyn S; Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA., Han JH; Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA., Savelli S; Human-Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA., Agrawal N; Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Vaccine hesitancy was a serious problem in the United States throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, due in part to the reduction in public trust in science that accompanied the pandemic. Now we are facing a new, similar but more extensive problem: booster hesitancy. Even fewer Americans are current on the mRNA booster. We present the results of an experiment with residents of the US who received all initial doses of the mRNA vaccine but who were not up to date on the booster. Participants read a scientific explanation describing either the safety or the effectiveness of the boosters or nothing in the control group. The explanations significantly increased (compared to the control) participants' perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of the mRNA booster, as well as their willingness to get boosted. Explanations also improved emotions and attitudes toward the booster. Furthermore, although liberals were significantly more willing to get boosted than were conservatives, improvement due to the explanations was similar across political ideology groups. However, when interactions were observed, conservatives increased to a greater degree. Importantly, the explanations increased participants' perception of scientists' expertise and knowledge, as well as participants' trust in scientists and the vaccine technology. |
