Autor: |
Choi SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Beom SH; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Choi YD; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Ham WS; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Han H; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Han WK; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Jang WS; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Lee SH; Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea., Cho J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. |
Abstrakt: |
Background/Objectives: Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) represents an early stage of metastatic disease characterized by a limited number of lesions. Recent advancements in imaging and treatment have revived interest in personalized therapies, including metastasis-directed radiotherapy (OMDRT) and primary prostate radiotherapy (PPR). This study evaluates the impact of OMDRT timing and the role of PPR on survival outcomes in OMPC patients; Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 patients with OMPC who underwent OMDRT between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Patients were classified based on OMDRT timing (early vs. late) and disease type (synchronous vs. metachronous). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models; Results: Among the patients, 36 (43.9%) had synchronous and 46 (56.1%) had metachronous OMD. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 77.5% and 88.5%, respectively. Early OMDRT significantly improved PFS (HR 0.461, 95% CI: 0.257-0.826, p = 0.009) and OS (HR 0.219, 95% CI: 0.080-0.603, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis showed the most favorable outcomes for synchronous OMD patients receiving early OMDRT, with a median PFS of 22.2 months and a 5-year survival rate of 42.1%. The treatment of the primary prostate provided a survival benefit in the OS of synchronous OMD patients (5-year 83.1% vs. 50%, p = 0.025), and there was a further improvement in OS after PPR (5-year 87.7% vs. 50%, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Early OMDRT significantly enhances survival outcomes in OMPC, in both synchronous and metachronous cases. The integration of PPR can further improve results, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment strategies. To more definitively clarify our findings across various clinical situations, further studies with larger cohorts or prospective designs are necessary. |