Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders.

Autor: Broll J; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), D-55122, Mainz, Germany. jan.broll@lir-mainz.de., Schäfer SK; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), D-55122, Mainz, Germany.; Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnostics, Technical University of Braunschweig, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany., Chmitorz A; Faculty of Social Work, Education and Nursing, Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, D-73728, Esslingen, Germany., Meule A; Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany., Voderholzer U; Schoen Clinic Roseneck, D-83209, Prien, Germany.; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, D-80336, Munich, Germany.; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, D-79085, Freiburg, Germany., Helmreich I; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), D-55122, Mainz, Germany., Lieb K; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), D-55122, Mainz, Germany.; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, D-55131, Mainz, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC psychiatry [BMC Psychiatry] 2024 Sep 27; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 631. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 27.
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x
Abstrakt: The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess individual differences in the ability to recover from stress despite adversity and has been translated into several languages. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties (i.e., item characteristics, reliability, factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity) of the German version of the BRS in persons with mental disorders. A total of N = 5,986 persons admitted to inpatient treatment completed the German version of the BRS and other questionnaires. The discriminating power of the items, the difficulty of the items, and the internal consistency were all sufficient. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the BRS, consistent with the findings of the German validation study in a non-clinical sample. The BRS also had strict measurement invariance across diagnostic groups for mental disorders according to ICD-10. Validity was examined using a network analysis, in which the BRS demonstrated positive correlations with life satisfaction, self-efficacy and optimism and negative correlations with somatic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. The BRS can serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing resilience in clinical settings, facilitating the identification of persons with potentially lower psychosocial resources.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje