Pathways of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Peer Bullying in Children and Youth: A Scoping Review.

Autor:	Runions KC; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia.; School Mental Health Ontario, Hamilton, ON, Canada., Sae-Koew JH; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia., Pearce N; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia., Sarasjärvi K; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Attey M; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia., Mitrou F; The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.; ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education [Health Educ Behav] 2024 Sep 22, pp. 10901981241275631. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 22.
DOI:	10.1177/10901981241275631
Abstrakt:	Growing up in socioeconomic disadvantage increases risk of peer bullying at school. Both socioeconomic status and involvement in bullying are predictive of a range of adverse developmental outcomes. However, neither (a) the mechanisms whereby disadvantage increases bullying risk nor (b) the developmental outcomes for which bullying may mediate disadvantage are clear. This review scoped the literature on the relationships between socioeconomic disadvantage, bullying, and health and developmental outcomes for school-aged children and adolescents. Four databases were searched up to June 3, 2023 with 565 studies retrieved, of which 17 met criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, and studies varied greatly in their definition and measurement of both bullying involvement and disadvantage. No intervention studies were found. Mediators of the disadvantage-bullying association ranged from individual level (e.g., depression) to the national level (e.g., homicide rate); only two studies examined bully-victim status. Of studies where bullying was a mediator, none examined bullying perpetration; the range of outcomes examined was narrowly focused on mental health, failing to capture the full range of developmental outcomes associated with either socioeconomic disadvantage or bullying involvement. This review highlights that future research is needed on identifying and understanding the mediators of the association between disadvantage and bullying victimization, and on the developmental outcomes mediated by bullying perpetration for disadvantaged children. These insights are critical to increase the effectiveness of community- and school-based bullying prevention, particularly in communities with high proportions of socioeconomically disadvantaged families. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu