The need for a broad perspective when assessing value-for-money for out-of-hours primary care.

Autor:	Phiri J; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Morreel S; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., De Graeve D; Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Philips H; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Beutels P; Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Verhoeven V; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Willem L; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Primary health care research & development [Prim Health Care Res Dev] 2024 Sep 20; Vol. 25, pp. e37. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 20.
DOI:	10.1017/S1463423624000318
Abstrakt:	Background: Out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care and to reduce the strain on emergency departments. As this modality gains traction in diverse healthcare settings, it is increasingly important to fully assess its societal value-for-money and conduct thorough process evaluations. However, current economic evaluations mostly emphasise direct- and short-term effect measures, thus lacking a broader societal perspective. Aim: This study offers a comprehensive overview of current effect measures in OOH-PC evaluations and proposes additional measures from the evaluation of integrated care programmes. Approach and Development: First, we systematically identified the effect measures from published cost-effectiveness studies and classified them as process, outcome, and resource use measures. Second, we elaborate on the incorporation of 'productivity gains', 'health promotion and early intervention', and 'continuity of care' as additional effects into economic evaluations of OOH-PC. Seeking care affects personal and employee time, potentially resulting in decreased productivity. Challenges in taking time off work and limited access to convenient care are often cited as barriers to accessing primary care. As such, OOH-PC can potentially reduce opportunity costs for patients. Furthermore, improving access to healthcare is important in determining whether people receive promotional and preventive services. Health promotion involves empowering people to take control of their health and its determinants. Given the unscheduled nature and the fragmented or rotational care in OOH-PC, the degree to which interventions and modalities provide continuity should be monitored, assessed, and included in economic evaluations. Continuity of care in primary care improves patient satisfaction, promotes adherence to medical advice, reduces reliance on hospitals, and reduces mortality. Conclusion: Although it is essential to also address local settings and needs, the integration of broader scope measures into OOH-PC economic evaluations improves the comprehensive evaluation that aligns with welfare gains.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu