Structural validation of two person-centred practice inventories PCPI-S and PCPI-C - French version.

Autor: Mabire C; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. cedric.mabire@chuv.ch., Piccot-Crezollet M; Geneva Institution for Home Care and Assistance (IMAD), Geneva, Switzerland., Tyagi V; Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia., McCormack B; Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia., Pellet J; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2024 Sep 18; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 1092. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 18.
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11432-y
Abstrakt: Background: The shift towards person-centred care has become integral in achieving high-quality healthcare, focusing on individual patient needs, preferences, and values. However, existing instruments for measuring person-centred practice often lack theoretical underpinnings and comprehensive assessment. The Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S) and the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Care (PCPI-C) were developed in English to measure clinicians' and patients' experience of person-centred practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the French version of the PCPI-S and PCPI-C.
Methods: A multi-centred cross-sectional study was conducted in six hospitals in French-speaking Switzerland. Construct validity of the PCPI-S and the PCPI-C was evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis and McDonald's Omega coefficient was used to determine the internal consistency.
Results: A sample of 558 healthcare professionals and 510 patients participated in the surveys. Psychometric analyses revealed positive item scores and acceptable factor loadings, demonstrating the meaningful contribution of each item to the measurement model. The Omega coefficient indicated acceptable to excellent internal consistency for the constructs. Model fit statistics demonstrated good model fit for the PCPI-S and PCPI-C.
Conclusions: The findings support the construct validity and internal consistency of the PCPI-S and PCPI-C in assessing person-centred practice among healthcare professionals and patients in French-speaking Switzerland. This validation offers valuable tools for evaluating person-centred care in hospital settings.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje