The financial burden of noncommunicable diseases from out-of-pocket expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Autor:	Odunyemi A; Murdoch Business School, Management & Marketing Department, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia.; Hospitals Management Board, Clinical Department, Alagbaka, Akure 340223, Ondo State, Nigeria., Islam MT; Murdoch Business School, Management & Marketing Department, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia., Alam K; Murdoch Business School, Management & Marketing Department, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Health promotion international [Health Promot Int] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 39 (5).
DOI:	10.1093/heapro/daae114
Abstrakt:	The growing financial burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) hinders the attainment of the sustainable development goals. However, there has been no updated synthesis of evidence in this regard. Therefore, our study summarizes the current evidence in the literature and identifies the gaps. We systematically search relevant databases (PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest) between 2015 and 2023, focusing on empirical studies on NCDs and their financial burden indicators, namely, catastrophic health expenditure (CHE), impoverishment, coping strategies, crowding-out effects and unmet needs for financial reasons (UNFRs) in SSA. We examined the distribution of the indicators, their magnitudes, methodological approaches and the depth of analysis. The 71 included studies mostly came from single-country (n = 64), facility-based (n = 52) research in low-income (n = 22), lower-middle-income (n = 47) and upper-middle-income (n = 10) countries in SSA. Approximately 50% of the countries lacked studies (n = 25), with 46% coming from West Africa. Cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes were the most commonly studied NCDs, with cancer and CVD causing the most financial burden. The review revealed methodological deficiencies related to lack of depth, equity analysis and robustness. CHE was high (up to 95.2%) in lower-middle-income countries but low in low-income and upper-middle-income countries. UNFR was almost 100% in both low-income and lower-middle-income countries. The use of extreme coping strategies was most common in low-income countries. There are no studies on crowding-out effect and pandemic-related UNFR. This study underscores the importance of expanded research that refines the methodological estimation of the financial burden of NCDs in SSA for equity implications and policy recommendations. (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu