Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.

Autor: Schnapp B; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA., Sehdev M; Harvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA., Schrepel C; Department of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA., Bord S; Department of Emergency Medicine The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA., Pelletier-Bui A; Department of Emergency Medicine Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Camden New Jersey USA., Alvarez A; Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA., Dubosh NM; Department of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA., Park YS; Department of Medical Education University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA., Shappell E; Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: AEM education and training [AEM Educ Train] 2024 Sep 12; Vol. 8 (5), pp. e11024. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 12 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11024
Abstrakt: Background: Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.
Objective: The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.
Methods: Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.
Results: Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.
Conclusions: Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(© 2024 The Author(s). AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: