Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among people with a family history of colorectal cancer: A scoping review.

Autor: Abdul Malik TF; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: tun.firzara@ummc.edu.my., Beh HC; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: hcbeh@ummc.edu.my., Selvaraj CS; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: christine@ummc.edu.my., Mallen CD; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK. Electronic address: c.d.mallen@keele.ac.uk., Ng CJ; Department of Research, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore 150167, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore. Electronic address: ng.chirk.jenn@singhealth.com.sg., Lee YK; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: leeyk@um.edu.my.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Preventive medicine [Prev Med] 2024 Dec; Vol. 189, pp. 108137. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 12.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108137
Abstrakt: Background: The global incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising, with people having a family history of CRC (PFH-CRC) facing double the risk compared to the average-risk population. Despite this, CRC screening uptake among PFH-CRC remains low. There is a lack of systematic mapping of interventions promoting CRC screening in this high-risk population.
Objective: We conducted a scoping review to identify the types of interventions targeting PFH-CRC, their effectiveness in increasing CRC screening uptake, and the elements associated with the outcomes.
Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping review was followed. The search for eligible articles was conducted from the inception of each database until 17 July 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Web of Science with no restrictions on language.
Results: Thirty studies from 1995 to 2023 across 13 countries were included; mostly from high-income countries. There was considerable variability in study design, intervention characteristics, and screening outcomes. Eleven studies used theoretical frameworks in intervention development. Fourteen studies reported statistically significant increases in screening uptake among PFH-CRC, most using complex, multiple-component interventions. Tailored print materials and patient navigation more consistently demonstrated increased screening uptake, while counselling yielded mixed results.
Conclusion: Interventions for promoting CRC screening uptake in PFH-CRC commonly incorporate print material, patient navigation and counselling, often combined into complex interventions. Future research should include more implementation studies to translate these interventions into real-world settings. Additionally, there are gaps in research from low- and middle-income countries, highlighting the need for further research in these resource-limited settings.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: