Autor: |
Filimonova M; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Shitova A; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Shevchenko L; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Soldatova O; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Surinova V; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Rybachuk V; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Kosachenko A; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Nikolaev K; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Volkova I; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Demyashkin G; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Stanojkovic TP; Department of Experimental Oncology, Laboratory for Radiobiology and Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia., Zizak Z; Department of Experimental Oncology, Laboratory for Radiobiology and Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia., Ivanov S; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Shegay P; National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Kaprin A; National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia., Filimonov A; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center-Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia. |
Abstrakt: |
Previously, we showed the antitumor activity of the new NOS/PDK inhibitor T1084 (1-isobutanoyl-2-isopropylisothiourea dichloroacetate). The present study included an assessment of in vitro cytotoxicity against human malignant and normal cells according to the MTT-test and in vivo antitumor effects in solid tumor models in comparison with precursor compounds T1023 (NOS inhibitor; 1-isobutanoyl-2-isopropylisothiourea hydrobromide) and Na-DCA (PDK inhibitor; sodium dichloroacetate), using morphological, histological, and immunohistochemical methods. The effects of T1084 and T1023 on the in vitro survival of normal (MRC-5) and most malignant cells (A375, MFC-7, K562, OAW42, and PC-3) were similar and quantitatively equal. At the same time, melanoma A375 cells showed 2-2.5 times higher sensitivity (IC 50 : 0.39-0.41 mM) to the cytotoxicity of T1023 and T1084 than other cells. And only HeLa cells showed significantly higher sensitivity to the cytotoxicity of T1084 compared to T1023 (IC 50 : 0.54 ± 0.03 and 0.81 ± 0.02 mM). Comparative studies of the in vivo antitumor effects of Na-DCA, T1023, and T1084 on CC-5 cervical cancer and B-16 melanoma in mice were conducted with subchronic daily i.p. administration of these agents at an equimolar dose of 0.22 mmol/kg (33.6, 60.0, and 70.7 mg/kg, respectively). Cervical cancer CC-5 fairly quickly evaded the effects of both Na-DCA and T1023. So, from the end of the first week of Na-DCA or T1023 treatment, the tumor growth inhibition (TGI) began to decrease from 40% to an insignificant level by the end of the observation. In contrast, in two independent experiments, CC-5 showed consistently high sensitivity to the action of T1084: a significant antitumor effect with high TGI (43-58%) was registered throughout the observation, without any signs of neoplasia adaptation. The effect of precursor compounds on melanoma B-16 was either minimal (for Na-DCA) or moderate (for T1023) with TGI only 33%, which subsequently decreased by the end of the experiment. In contrast, the effect of T1084 on B-16 was qualitatively more pronounced and steadily increasing; it was accompanied by a 3-fold expansion of necrosis and dystrophy areas, a decrease in proliferation, and increased apoptosis of tumor cells. Morphologically, the T1084 effect was 2-fold superior to the effects of T1023-the TGI index reached 59-62%. This study suggests that the antitumor effects of T1084 develop through the interaction of NOS-dependent and PDK-dependent pathophysiological effects of this NOS/PDK inhibitor. The NOS inhibitory activity of T1084 exerts an anti-angiogenic effect on neoplasia. At the same time, the PDK inhibitory activity of T1084 enhances the cytotoxicity of induced intratumoral hypoxia and suppresses the development of neoplasia adaptation to anti-angiogenic stress. Such properties allow T1084 to overcome tumor resistance and realize a stable synergistic antitumor effect. |