Real time control of stormwater biofilters improves the removal of organic chemicals.

Autor: Zhang J; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Electronic address: jiadong.zhang@unsw.edu.au., Prodanovic V; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research and Development of Serbia, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia., O'Carroll DM; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia., Zheng Z; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; WaterNSW, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia., Zhang K; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Water research [Water Res] 2024 Nov 15; Vol. 266, pp. 122411. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 07.
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122411
Abstrakt: Biofilters are among the most popular nature-based systems for treating stormwater and delivering multiple environmental benefits. However, as a passive system, their performance tends to be inconsistent in removing emerging organic contaminants produced by anthropogenic activities that can be persistent, mobile, and toxic. Thus, in this study, real time control (RTC) of stormwater biofilters is introduced to enhance the removal of a diverse range of organic chemicals. Laboratory columns were employed to investigate the performance of five RTC strategies, i.e., dynamic soil moisture control (RTC-Moisture), infiltration rate control (RTC-IR), pre-drain (RTC-PreDrain), fully unsaturated (RTC-UnSat), and fully saturated (RTC-FulSat). These RTC strategies were tested under varying rainfall sizes, as well as dry and wet conditions. Additionally, the study examined the accumulation of organic chemicals in the media. The results revealed that RTC-Moisture, RTC-IR, and RTC-PreDrain were the top three performing strategies, which achieved a significantly higher removal rate than Non-RTC biofilters for the majority of tested organic chemicals (p-value < 0.05). The best RTC strategy, RTC-Moisture, not only had the highest overall performance (average removal rate of 76.1 %) but was also least affected by various rainfall events. Despite a better chemical removal found in RTC-Moisture and RTC-PreDrain, there was no significant overall increase in the accumulation of organic chemicals within the media (p-value > 0.05) when compared to Non-RTC biofilters. This may indicate that the biodegradation process could be promoted in the well-performing RTC biofilters. This study confirms the possibility of using RTC strategies to enhance organic chemical removal in stormwater biofilters.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE