Do concepts of individuality account for individuation practices in studies of host-parasite systems? A modeling account of biological individuality.

Autor: Kranke N; Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 76, 79104, Freiburg, Germany. nina.kranke@nature.uni-freiburg.de.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften [Theory Biosci] 2024 Nov; Vol. 143 (4), pp. 279-292. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 13.
DOI: 10.1007/s12064-024-00426-3
Abstrakt: In recent discussions, the widespread conviction that scientific individuation practices are governed by theories and concepts of biological individuality has been challenged, particularly by advocates of practice-based approaches. This discussion raises questions about the relationship between individuation practices and concepts of individuality. In this paper, I discuss four studies of host-parasite systems and analyze the respective individuation practices to see whether they correspond to established concepts of biological individuality. My analysis suggests that scientists individuate biological systems on different levels of organization and that the researchers' respective emphasis on one of the levels depends on the explanandum and research context as well as epistemic aims and purposes. It thus makes sense to use different concepts of individuality to account for different individuation practices. However, not all individuation practices are represented equally well by concepts of biological individuality. To account for this observation, I propose that concepts of individuality should be understood as abstracted, idealized, or simplified models that represent only certain aspects of scientific practice. A modeling account suggests a pluralistic view of concepts of biological individuality that not only allows the coexistence of different kinds of individuality (e.g., evolutionary individuality, immunological individuality, ecological individuality) but also of normative and descriptive concepts.
Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Availability of data and materials: Not applicable.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: