The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties Leadership Mentoring Program: Ten years of positive outcomes.
Autor: | Ainslie M; University of New Hampshire, 4 Library Way, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America; NONPF Senior Fellow 2023-2025, 1200 18th St, NW, #700, Washington, DC 20036, United States of America. Electronic address: marcy.ainslie@unh.edu., Bigley MB; National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, United States of America., Yingling C; University of Michigan School of Nursing, United States of America., Hooks JD; Clayton State University, United States of America., DeClerk L; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States of America; Department of Practice, College of Nursing, United States of America. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing [J Prof Nurs] 2024 Sep-Oct; Vol. 54, pp. 249-256. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 10. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.08.001 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Nursing leadership programs can have a positive impact on organizations and communities. Health equity in nursing requires leaders who parallel the population demographics. Purpose: This work evaluated the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties Leadership Mentoring Program (LMP) 10 years from its inception. Lessons learned from this evaluation can inform leadership initiatives in nursing and other health professions. Method: This cross-sectional evaluation applied the Context, Inputs, Process, and Products model to gauge effectiveness of the LMP. All 48 participants were invited to participate. Results: Thirty-two survey respondents, a 67 % response rate, demonstrated a 767 % increase in extramural scholarship collaborations and promotion to associate and full professor at 43 % and 90 %, respectively. Academic leadership positions to department chair, assistant/associate dean, and dean increased 200 %, 167 %, and 100 %, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of program participants are engaged on boards and committees at local, state, national, and international levels. These roles significantly impact legislative, policy, advocacy, and regulatory efforts, signifying the LMP's influence on broader societal and professional domains. Conclusion: Identifying clear program outcomes and metrics for leadership program evaluation can advance diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. Sustainable funding models for leadership development will have a high return on investment for health professions. (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |