Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Autor:	Danazumi MS; Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Sciences, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia., Adamu IA; Department of Physiotherapy, Federal Medical Centre, Nguru, Yobe State, Nigeria., Usman MH; Department of Physiotherapy, Federal Medical Centre, Nguru, Yobe State, Nigeria., Yakasai AM; Medical Rehabilitation Therapists (Registration) Board of Nigeria, North-West Zonal Office, Kano State, Nigeria.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of osteopathic medicine [J Osteopath Med] 2024 Sep 12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 12.
DOI:	10.1515/jom-2023-0075
Abstrakt:	Context: The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP. Objectives: The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals. Methods: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization. Results: The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with " side-lying " being the most practiced sexual position and " standing " being the least practiced sexual position by females. While " lying supine " was the most practiced sexual position and " sitting on a chair " was the least practiced sexual position by males. Conclusions: This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR. (© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu