Low Contrast Acuity Outcomes After SMILE and LASIK.
| Autor: | Sia RK, Eaddy I, Beydoun H, Eaddy JB, Hogan A, Skurski ZP |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) [J Refract Surg] 2024 Sep; Vol. 40 (9), pp. e667-e671. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 01. |
| DOI: | 10.3928/1081597X-20240723-04 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: To compare early visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of low contrast acuity. Methods: A secondary analysis was performed using a harmonized dataset derived from two completed prospective cohort studies on active-duty military service members undergoing either SMILE (n = 37), wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK (n = 51), or wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK (n = 56). Night vision and photopic and mesopic low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) up to 3 months postoperatively were compared between groups. Results: Compared to SMILE-treated eyes, WFG LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better night vision and photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .016; beta = -0.043, P = .007, respectively). WFO LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .012) but had worse mesopic LCVA at 3 months postoperatively (beta = 0.033, P = .015) versus SMILE-treated eyes. Conclusions: SMILE and LASIK, on either a WFG or WFO laser platform, yielded excellent outcomes, but LCVA seemed to recover quicker following LASIK compared to SMILE. [ J Refract Surg . 2024;40(9):e667-e671.] . |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|