Developing a shared language: a proposed guide to frame early implementation science collaboration discussions.

Autor:	Best S; Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., Peters S; Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium., Guccione L; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., Francis J; Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada., Klaic M; Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Translational behavioral medicine [Transl Behav Med] 2024 Oct 06; Vol. 14 (10), pp. 571-577.
DOI:	10.1093/tbm/ibae044
Abstrakt:	Miscommunication between health care practitioners and implementation researchers can lead to a mismatch of expectations and understandings, resulting in wasted research and frustration. Conversely, combining the expertise and knowledge of those working in health care practice and implementation research can deliver context informed research questions and appropriate study designs. Achieving this ambition requires a shared language. We sought to develop a guide to identify a common language to constructively explore nascent implementation research concepts. We set up a working group, comprising of implementation researchers, health care practitioners and operational managers, to work through ideas generation, debate and a consensus process to generate and refine a discussion guide. The resultant guide steps health care practitioners and implementation researchers through a three-phase enquiry - Question 1: What is the implementation question? Question 2: What is the proposed implementation solution? And Question 3: How can the investigation of this idea be resourced? At each step, the health care practitioner and implementation researcher collaborate to include theory and practice and rigorously work through the question to build implementation on evidence and to promote diverse stakeholder engagement. The next steps for this study will be operationalising the discussion guide, as an interactive tool. Future evaluation, to test effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility will be designed with health care practitioners and implementation researchers. (© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu