Let's not abandon programmed frozen embryo transfers yet: a countercurrent perspective.

Autor: Pirtea P; Department of Ob-Gyn and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Foch - Université de Paris Ouest (UVSQ), Paris, France.. Electronic address: ppirtea@gmail.com., Toner JP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA., Scott RT Jr; IVI RMA New Jersey, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA., de Ziegler D; Department of Ob-Gyn and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Foch - Université de Paris Ouest (UVSQ), Paris, France.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Reproductive biomedicine online [Reprod Biomed Online] 2024 Nov; Vol. 49 (5), pp. 104365. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 06.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104365
Abstrakt: The countercurrent opinion given in this paper is that the optimal management of frozen embryo transfers (FET) is not a one-size-fits-all matter, but rather one that should be decided after considering all the various parameters and options. This choice should notably encompass patients' individual characteristics - including variable risks of obstetric complications - and weigh out the respective advantages of each FET option in each case. While there may be real advantages for natural-cycle FET in many cases, these need to be balanced against both practical and clinical issues. Contrary to several prevailing, sometimes loudly expressed suggestions, there is not a one single effective approach when it comes to choosing a mode of scheduling FET.
(Copyright © 2024 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: