Should We Use Aspirin or P2Y 12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease?
Autor: | Chandiramani R; 600 N Wolfe St sted 560, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA., Mehta A; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA., Blumenthal RS; 600 N Wolfe St sted 560, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA., Williams MS; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, 301 Mason Lord Drive, Suite 2400, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. mwillia1@jhmi.edu. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Current atherosclerosis reports [Curr Atheroscler Rep] 2024 Nov; Vol. 26 (11), pp. 649-658. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 07. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11883-024-01234-2 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose of Review: To summarize the recent evidence and guideline recommendations on aspirin or P2Y Recent Findings: It has been questioned whether the evidence for aspirin as the foundational component of secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease aligns with contemporary pharmaco-invasive strategies. The recent HOST-EXAM study randomized patients who had received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 to 18 months without ischemic or major bleeding events to either clopidogrel or aspirin for a further 24 months, and demonstrated that the patients in the clopidogrel arm had significantly lower rates of both thrombotic and bleeding complications compared to those in the aspirin arm. The patient-level PANTHER meta-analysis showed that in patients with established coronary artery disease, P2Y (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |