Using Pop-GUIDE to Assess the Applicability of MCnest for Relative Risk of Pesticides to Hummingbirds.

Autor:	Etterson MA; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA., Paulukonis EA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Durham, NC 27709, USA., Purucker ST; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Ecologies [Ecologies (Basel)] 2023 Mar 03; Vol. 4 (1), pp. 171-194.
DOI:	10.3390/ecologies4010013
Abstrakt:	Hummingbirds are charismatic fauna that provide important pollination services, including in the continental US, where 15 species regularly breed. Compared to other birds in North America, hummingbirds (family Trochilidae) have a unique exposure route to pesticides because they forage on nectar. Therefore, hummingbirds may be exposed to systemic pesticides borne in nectar. They also may be particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure due to their small size and extreme metabolic demands. We review relevant factors including hummingbird life history, nectar residue uptake, and avian bioenergetic considerations with the goal of clearly identifying and articulating the specific modeling challenges that must be overcome to develop and/or adapt existing modeling approaches. To help evaluate these factors, we developed a dataset for ruby-throated hummingbirds ( Archilochus colubris ) and other avian species potentially exposed to pesticides. We used the systemic neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid as an illustration and compared results to five other common current use pesticides. We use the structure of Pop-GUIDE to provide a conceptual modeling framework for implementation of MCnest and to compile parameter values and relevant algorithms to predict the effects of pesticide exposure on avian pollinators. Conservative screening assessments suggest the potential for adverse effects from imidacloprid, as do more refined assessments, though many important limitations and uncertainties remain. Our review found many areas in which current USEPA avian models must be improved in order to conduct a full higher-tier risk assessment for avian pollinators exposed to neonicotinoid insecticides, including addition of models suitable for soil and seed treatments within the MCnest environment, ability to include empirical residue data in both nectar and invertebrates rather than relying on existing nomograms, expansion of MCnest to a full annual cycle, and increased representation of spatial heterogeneity. Although this work focuses on hummingbirds, the methods and recommendations may apply more widely to other vertebrate pollinators. Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu