A Structured Approach to Involve Stakeholders in Prioritising Topics for Systematic Reviews in Public Health.

Autor:	Hoekstra D; Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology (BIPS), Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.; Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.; Department of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany., Mütsch M; Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Borchard A; Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; Cochrane Switzerland Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland., Kien C; Department for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems an der Donau, Austria.; Cochrane Austria University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Griebler U; Department for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems an der Donau, Austria.; Cochrane Austria University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Von Elm E; Cochrane Switzerland Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland., Rehfuess E; Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.; Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany., Gerhardus A; Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.; Department for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany., Lhachimi SK; Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology (BIPS), Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.; Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.; Department of Nursing Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	International journal of public health [Int J Public Health] 2024 Aug 21; Vol. 69, pp. 1606642. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 21 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.3389/ijph.2024.1606642
Abstrakt:	Objectives: This study aimed to develop and apply a structured approach for prioritising topics for systematic reviews in public health, framed according to the readily applicable PICO format, which encourages the involvement of stakeholders' preferences in a transparent matter. Methods: We developed a multi-stage process, consisting of a scoping and two Delphi stages with web-based surveys and invited public health stakeholders in Switzerland to participate: First, respondents specified topics for different public health domains, which were reformulated in a PICO format by content analysis. Second, respondents rated the topics using five stakeholder-refined assessment criteria. Overall rankings were calculated to assess differences between stakeholder groups and rating criteria. Results: In total, 215 respondents suggested 728 topics altogether. The response rate in the two Delphi stages was 91.6% and 77.6%, respectively. Most top-rated review topics focused on the effectiveness of interventions providing education to different target groups, followed by interventions to increase access to specific healthcare services. Conclusion: Our approach encourages involvement of stakeholders in identifying priorities for systematic reviews and highlights disparities between stakeholders and between individual criteria. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Hoekstra, Mütsch, Borchard, Kien, Griebler, Von Elm, Rehfuess, Gerhardus and Lhachimi.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu