Classification of myo-connective tissue injuries for severity grading and return to play prediction: A scoping review.
Autor: | Fontanier V; Medinetic Learning, Research Department, France. Electronic address: v.fontanier@medinetic.fr., Bruchard A; Medinetic Learning, Research Department, France., Tremblay M; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada., Mohammed R; Private Practice., da Silva-Oolup S; Undergraduate and Graduate Education Departments: Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada., Suri-Chilana M; Undergraduate and Graduate Education Departments: Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada., Pasquier M; Private Practice., Hachem S; Paris-Saclay University, Inserm, 'Exposome and Heredity' Team, CESP, France., Meyer AL; Private Practice., Honoré M; Private Practice., Vigne G; Medinetic Learning, Research Department, France., Bermon S; Health and Science Department, World Athletics, Monaco; LAMHESS, Université Côte d'Azur, France., Murnaghan K; Library Services, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada., Lemeunier N; Medinetic Learning, Research Department, France; UMR1295, Toulouse III University, Inserm, Equipe EQUITY, Equipe constitutive du CERPOP, France; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Canada. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of science and medicine in sport [J Sci Med Sport] 2024 Aug 08. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 08. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2024.07.016 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: To conduct a systematic literature search to identify currently used classifications of acute non-contact muscle injuries in sporting adults. Designs: Scoping review. Methods: A systematic literature search from January 1, 2010 to April 19, 2022 of Medline and SPORTDiscus yielded 13,426 articles that were screened for eligibility. Findings from included studies were qualitatively synthesized. Classifications and their grading, as well as outcomes and definitions were extracted. Results: Twenty-four classifications were identified from the 37 included studies, most of which had low evidence study designs. Majority (57 %) of classifications were published after 2009 and were mostly developed for hamstring or other lower limb injuries. The six most cited classifications accounted for 70 % of the reports (BAMIC, modified Peetrons, Munich, Cohen, Chan and MLG-R). Outcome reporting was sparse, making it difficult to draw conclusions. Still, significant relationships between grading and time to return to play were reported for the BAMIC, modified Peetrons, Munich and Cohen classifications. Other classifications either had a very low number of reported associations, reported no associations, reported inconclusive associations, or did not report an assessment of the association. Other outcomes were poorly investigated. Conclusions: There is no agreed-upon use of muscle classification, and no consensus on definitions and terminology. As a result, reported outcomes and their relationship to severity grading are inconsistent across studies. There is a need to improve the generalizability and applicability of existing classifications and to refine their prognostic value. High-level evidence studies are needed to resolve these inconsistencies. Competing Interests: Declaration of interest statement None declared. (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |