Identifying motivational interviewing techniques in Quitline smoking cessation counselling sessions from Queensland, Australia.

Autor:	Bendotti H; Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.; Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia., Marshall HM; Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.; Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Australia., Gartner C; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia., Ireland D; Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia., Lawler S; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of health psychology [J Health Psychol] 2024 Sep 01, pp. 13591053241274091. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 01.
DOI:	10.1177/13591053241274091
Abstrakt:	Motivational interviewing (MI) is a common approach for smoking cessation counselling, yet little is known about the use of MI techniques in practice. This qualitative content analysis applied a published classification of content and relational MI techniques to a sample of 30 Quitline transcripts (January-March 2019) from Queensland, Australia. Overall, 36 MI techniques (94.7%) were identified at least once within the total sample. On average, 20 techniques (52.6%) were used in an individual conversation with a small difference observed between initial and follow-up calls. Techniques most frequently applied across conversations were largely relational, while techniques addressing client ambivalence/resistance were less frequently/never applied. Variability in techniques between individual initial and follow-up calls highlights the high degree of personalisation when applying MI to smoking cessation. Further investigations exploring associations of individual techniques and cessation outcomes are warranted. The classification may prove useful for assessments of fidelity for training and monitoring activities. Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: HM is the Convenor of the Tobacco Control Specialist Interest Group, Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand, and a member of the Cancer Council Victoria Quit Centre Advisory Committee, the IASLC Tobacco Control Committee and the APSR Tobacco Control section chair. CG is the President of Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Oceania Chapter.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu