A survey of the Nutrition Care Process in Japanese acute care hospitals using a nationwide web-based questionnaire.

Autor:	Maeda K; Nutrition Therapy Support Center, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan. Email: kskmaeda1701@gmail.com; kskmaeda@ ncgg.go.jp.; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.; Department of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan., Egashira F; PEACH Atsugi, Community Nutritional Care Center, Atsugi, Japan., Ueshima J; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.; Department of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.; Department of Nutritional Service, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan., Horikoshi Y; Medical Affairs Department, Research and Development Center, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Tokyo, Japan., Kamoshita S; Medical Affairs Department, Research and Development Center, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition [Asia Pac J Clin Nutr] 2024 Dec; Vol. 33 (4), pp. 515-528.
DOI:	10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0006
Abstrakt:	Background and Objectives: Study aim was to determine the levels and barriers of the Nutrition Care Process (NCP), a practical method of individualized nutrition support. Methods and Study Design: Delegate of registered dietitians (RDs) from acute-care hospitals answered our nationwide web-based questionnaire (April-June, 2023) to determine the implementation status of screening, assessment, intervention (including planning), and monitoring (components of the NCP). Results: Of 5,378 institutions contacted, 905 (16.8%) responded. For Screening, 80.0% screened all inpatients: primary personnel in charge were RDs (57.6%); the most used screening tool was Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) (49.2%). For Assessment, 66.1% assessed all inpatients: food intake (93.3%) was most evaluated whereas muscle mass and strength (13.0%, 8.8%) were least evaluated. For Intervention, 43.9% did so within 48h of hospital admission: oral nutritional supplement (92.9%) was the most common RDs intervention and parenteral nutrition (29.9%) was used less. For Monitoring, 18.5% of institutions had monitoring frequency of ≥ 3 times/week whilst 23.0% had monitoring less than once a week for severely malnourished patients. Energy and protein intake (93.7%, 84.3%) were most monitored and lipid intake (30.1%) was less monitored. Conclusions: Barriers of NCP included inefficient staffing systems and unsuitable tools in Screening, inaccurate patient targeting and lack of important evaluation items in Assessment, delayed timing and incomplete contents in Intervention, and inadequate fre-quency and lack of important evaluation items in Monitoring. An increase in RDs staffing in acute-care general wards, widespread NCP instruction manuals, and education about the tools and evaluation items utilized in nutritional management are possible solutions. Competing Interests: K. Maeda received lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. F. Egashira received lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Terumo Corporation, FoodCare Co., Ltd., The Nisshin OilliO Group, Ltd., Meiji Co., Ltd., Abbott Japan LLC. J. Ueshima declares no competing inter-ests. Y. Horikoshi and S. Kamoshita report personal fees re-ceived from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., which were not related to the submitted work
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu