| Autor: |
Thabet M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Abdelhafez MS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Elshamy MR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Albahlol IA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia., Fayala E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Wageeh A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., El-Zayadi AA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Bahgat NA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Mohammed SM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Mohamed AA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., Awad MM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., El-Menayyer A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt., El-Sherbiny M; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, P.O. Box 71666, Riyadh 11597, Saudi Arabia.; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt., Elsherbini DMA; Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, P.O. Box 2014, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia., Albarakati RG; Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, P.O. Box 71666, Riyadh 11597, Saudi Arabia., Alshaikh ABA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia., Edris FE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Umm AlQura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia., Bushaqer NJ; Bahrain Defence Force (BDF) Hospital, Riffa P.O. Box 28743, Bahrain., Salama YGM; Bahrain Defence Force (BDF) Hospital, Riffa P.O. Box 28743, Bahrain., Abdel-Razik MM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background and Objectives : Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a widespread endocrine disorder affecting 5-18% of females in their childbearing age. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of combining a low dosage of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) along with clomiphene citrate (CC) for stimulating ovulation in infertile women diagnosed with CC-resistant PCOS. Materials and Methods : A randomized controlled trial was carried out on 300 infertile CC-resistant PCOS women. All participants were assigned to two groups: the CC-HCG group and the CC-Placebo group. Subjects in the CC-HCG group were given CC (150 mg/day for 5 days starting on the 2nd day of the cycle) and HCG (200 IU/day SC starting on the 7th day of the cycle). Subjects in the CC-Placebo group were given CC and a placebo. The number of ovarian follicles > 18 mm, cycle cancellation rate, endometrial thickness, ovulation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and occurrence of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome were all outcome variables in the primary research. Results : Data from 138 individuals in the CC-HCG group and 131 participants in the CC-Placebo group were subjected to final analysis. In comparison to the CC-Placebo group, the cycle cancellation rate in the CC-HCG group was considerably lower. The CC-HCG group exhibited a substantial increase in ovarian follicles reaching > 18 mm, endometrial thickness, and ovulation rate. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the CC-HCG group (7.2% vs. 2.3%; CC-HCG vs. CC-Placebo). Upon adjusting for BMI and age, the findings of our study revealed that individuals in the CC-HCG group who had serum prolactin levels below 20 (ng/mL), secondary infertility, infertility duration less than 4 years, baseline LH/FSH ratios below 1.5, and serum AMH levels more than 4 (ng/mL) had a higher likelihood of achieving pregnancy. In the CC-Placebo group, there was a greater prediction of clinical pregnancy for those with serum AMH (<4), primary infertility, serum prolactin ≤ 20 (ng/mL), baseline LH/FSH < 1.5, and infertility duration < 4 years. Conclusions : The use of a small dose of HCG along with CC appeared to be an effective treatment in reducing cycle cancelation, improving the clinical pregnancy rate and ovulation rate in CC-resistant PCOS patients. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials.gov, identifier NCT02436226. |
