| Autor: |
Lei J; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China., Chen X; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China., Zhou H; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China., Zhang Z; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China., Xu Z; Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering and Molecular Breeding of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430023, China., Xu K; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China., Chen H; Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.; Hubei Hongshan Laboratory (HHL), Wuhan 430070, China. |
| Abstrakt: |
Glaesserella parasuis (GPS) can cause severe systemic inflammation in pigs, resulting in huge economic losses to the pig industry. At present, no effective method is available for the prevention and control of GPS infection. Molecular breeding for disease resistance is imminent, but disease-resistance genes have not been identified. To study the mechanism of systemic acute inflammation caused by GPS, we established three in vitro infection models (3D4/21 cells, PK15 cells, and PAVEC cells) according to its infection path. There was no significant difference in apoptosis among the three kinds of cells after 12 h of continuous GPS stimulation, while inflammatory factors were significantly upregulated. Subsequent transcriptome analysis revealed 1969, 1207, and 3564 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in 3D4/21 cells, PK15 cells, and PAVEC cells, respectively, after GPS infection. Many of the DEGs were predicted to be associated with inflammatory responses (C3, CD44, etc.); cell proliferation, growth and apoptosis; gene expression; and protein phosphorylation. Key signaling pathways, including S100 family signaling, bacteria and virus recognition, and pathogen-induced cytokine storm signaling, were enriched based on Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Furthermore, a total of three putative transmembrane receptors and two putative G-protein-coupled receptors, namely F3, ICAM1, PLAUR, ACKR3, and GPRC5A, were identified by IPA among the three types of cells. ACKR3 and GPRC5A play pivotal roles in bacterial adhesion, invasion, host immune response and inflammatory response through the S100 family signaling pathway. Our findings provide new insights into the pathological mechanisms underlying systemic inflammation caused by GPS infection in pigs, and they lay a foundation for further research on disease-resistance breeding to GPS. |
